Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Minotaurs: Lords of Maze and Horn

  1. #21
    I like minotaurs I do. But there is good debate about whether they should be in the beastmen faction. Also, I think this will be the 20th post in this thread. The last 5 have been about Minotaurs being in a faction vote, so there's really only 15 that are actually about this race. That's fewer than the Goblin thread that just started. Is that enough support to warrant inclusion in a vote right now? The Fey had twenty something. The Beastmen had 18. It's your game, of course, Aaron. But I just question what people would be voting for if they saw this as an option.

  2. #22
    Archmage of the Central Tower Happerry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    I'd vote for them over the beastmen...

  3. #23
    Arcane Candidate
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Great suggestion, both beastmen and minotaur.

    We all know and like the standard fantasy races, but what about someone a little bit more unique and with a different flavor? Instead of two human races, or two elven races, we could have one of these instead.

  4. #24
    Mage of the Lesser Tower Rybon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    I would chose Minotaur over beastman. I think there are plenty of different types of beastman that Minotaurs could stand on there own.

    Oh and the gnomes have more replies than Dark elves sooooo.

  5. #25
    I always liked the Dragonlance Minotaurs. Depending on what nations make it in the game and how you use them you will probably already have plenty of barbarian races. Having a warrior race with exceptional naval abilities and more intelligence / sophistication may fit in nicely. Usually all the large warrior races are stupid and undisiplined so this could be a good change of pace. Unit diversity may be a problem though.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts